Abstract:
The paper by Devlin and Poldrack entitled ‘In Praise of Tedious
Anatomy’ deals with an increasingly important topic. Namely, how
do we effectively communicate, with appropriate accuracy and
precision, the ‘where’ of our measurements? They make cogent
arguments for the use of anatomical maps to reference the location
of functionally active regions of brain as measured with fMRI. We
agree with this premise and would like to amplify further (with
some additional suggestions) the rationale for equating functional
measures with observations about structure. But before we do that,
it might be useful to first generalize this issue, as one that pertains
to 1) comparing data collected across multiple subjects, modalities,
experiments and laboratories and 2) integrating this data as a
comprehensive whole.